Bhutan vs North Korea: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Bhutan
0 Cases
in 2024
North Korea
0 Cases
in 2022
Bhutan rank
108th
North Korea rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Bhutan
- North Korea
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in North Korea, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1978 it was North Korea ahead.
Bhutan ranks 108th and North Korea ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and North Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7.5 Cases | 345.5 Cases | 338 Cases | North Korea |
| 1980s | 31.7 Cases | 546.2 Cases | 514.5 Cases | North Korea |
| 1990s | 10.71 Cases | 2.43 Cases | 8.29 Cases | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 10.33 Cases | 0 Cases | 10.33 Cases | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.8889 Cases | 0 Cases | 0.8889 Cases | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Bhutan or North Korea?
- Bhutan, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in North Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Bhutan and North Korea?
- 0 Cases, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and North Korea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2022.
- How do Bhutan and North Korea rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Bhutan ranks 108th and North Korea ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.