Barbados vs Uruguay: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus
Barbados
0 Cases
in 2024
Uruguay
0 Cases
in 2024
Barbados rank
108th
Uruguay rank
108th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus over time
- Barbados
- Uruguay
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Uruguay, a difference of 0 Cases.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Uruguay ahead.
Barbados ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 12.5 Cases | 19.33 Cases | 6.83 Cases | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 5.2 Cases | 8.8 Cases | 3.6 Cases | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 1.3 Cases | 2.6 Cases | 1.3 Cases | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.875 Cases | 0.875 Cases | 0 Cases | — |
| 2010s | 0 Cases | 0.6 Cases | 0.6 Cases | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 Cases | 0.4 Cases | 0.4 Cases | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, Barbados or Uruguay?
- Barbados, at 0 Cases against 0 Cases in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus between Barbados and Uruguay?
- 0 Cases, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Uruguay?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Uruguay rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus?
- Barbados ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization – Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The annual number of confirmed cases of tetanus. Confirmed numbers underestimate the actual number of tetanus cases, due to limited testing and reporting capacity.