Luxembourg vs Malawi: Net food imports by crop - Wheat

Luxembourg
117,632
in 2019
Malawi
115,890
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
102nd
Malawi rank
103rd

Net food imports by crop - Wheat over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Malawi
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199820082019

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 117,632 against 115,890 in Malawi, a difference of 1,742.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 102nd and Malawi ranks 103rd of 174 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 24,783 69,204 44,421 Malawi
2010s 97,805 164,467 66,662 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - wheat, Luxembourg or Malawi?
Luxembourg, at 117,632 against 115,890 in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - wheat between Luxembourg and Malawi?
1,742, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malawi?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Luxembourg and Malawi rank globally for net food imports by crop - wheat?
Luxembourg ranks 102nd and Malawi ranks 103rd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Wheat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Wheat
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
175 places, 7,821 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.