Eswatini vs Liberia: Net food imports by crop - Wheat

Eswatini
48,214
in 2019
Liberia
36,100
in 2019
Eswatini rank
115th
Liberia rank
117th

Net food imports by crop - Wheat over time

  • Eswatini
  • Liberia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119902019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 48,214 against 36,100 in Liberia, a difference of 12,114.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Liberia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 115th and Liberia ranks 117th of 174 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Liberia Difference Ahead
2000s 36,092 37,078 986.4 Liberia
2010s 37,719 31,591 6,128 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - wheat, Eswatini or Liberia?
Eswatini, at 48,214 against 36,100 in Liberia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - wheat between Eswatini and Liberia?
12,114, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Liberia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Liberia rank globally for net food imports by crop - wheat?
Eswatini ranks 115th and Liberia ranks 117th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Wheat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Wheat
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
175 places, 7,821 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.