Costa Rica vs Latvia: Net food imports by crop - Wheat
Costa Rica
273,494
in 2019
Latvia
267,165
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
73rd
Latvia rank
75th
Net food imports by crop - Wheat over time
- Costa Rica
- Latvia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 273,494 against 267,165 in Latvia, a difference of 6,329.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 75th of 175 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21,418 | 0 | 21,418 | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 75,698 | 0 | 75,698 | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 116,092 | 31,640 | 84,452 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 160,586 | 89,422 | 71,164 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 207,032 | 40,852 | 166,180 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 254,984 | 224,697 | 30,287 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - wheat, Costa Rica or Latvia?
- Costa Rica, at 273,494 against 267,165 in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - wheat between Costa Rica and Latvia?
- 6,329, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Latvia?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Latvia rank globally for net food imports by crop - wheat?
- Costa Rica ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 75th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Wheat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.