Bolivia vs Eswatini: Net food imports by crop - Wheat

Bolivia
56,231
in 2019
Eswatini
48,214
in 2019
Bolivia rank
114th
Eswatini rank
115th

Net food imports by crop - Wheat over time

  • Bolivia
  • Eswatini
-100.0k0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119902019

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 56,231 against 48,214 in Eswatini, a difference of 8,017.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 114th and Eswatini ranks 115th of 174 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 194,963 36,092 158,871 Bolivia
2010s 86,661 37,561 49,100 Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - wheat, Bolivia or Eswatini?
Bolivia, at 56,231 against 48,214 in Eswatini as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - wheat between Bolivia and Eswatini?
8,017, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Eswatini?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Bolivia and Eswatini rank globally for net food imports by crop - wheat?
Bolivia ranks 114th and Eswatini ranks 115th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Wheat. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Wheat
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
175 places, 7,821 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.