Nicaragua vs Palestine, State of: Net food imports by crop - Soybeans
Nicaragua
-2,357
in 2019
Palestine, State of
-3,870
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
124th
Palestine, State of rank
127th
Net food imports by crop - Soybeans over time
- Nicaragua
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports -2,357 against -3,870 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 1,513.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 124th and Palestine, State of ranks 127th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 230 | -641.67 | 871.67 | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0 | 560 | 560 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | -1,179 | -1,684 | 505.5 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - soybeans, Nicaragua or Palestine, State of?
- Nicaragua, at -2,357 against -3,870 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - soybeans between Nicaragua and Palestine, State of?
- 1,513, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Palestine, State of rank globally for net food imports by crop - soybeans?
- Nicaragua ranks 124th and Palestine, State of ranks 127th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Soybeans. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.