Ecuador vs Saint Lucia: Net food imports by crop - Soybeans

Ecuador
6
in 2019
Saint Lucia
1
in 2019
Ecuador rank
88th
Saint Lucia rank
91st

Net food imports by crop - Soybeans over time

  • Ecuador
  • Saint Lucia
010.0k20.0k30.0k199620072019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 6 against 1 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 5.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 6.0 times Saint Lucia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 88th and Saint Lucia ranks 91st of 165 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 115 -1.57 116.57 Ecuador
2010s 63.4 3.4 60 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - soybeans, Ecuador or Saint Lucia?
Ecuador, at 6 against 1 in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - soybeans between Ecuador and Saint Lucia?
5, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saint Lucia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Saint Lucia rank globally for net food imports by crop - soybeans?
Ecuador ranks 88th and Saint Lucia ranks 91st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Soybeans. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Soybeans
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
165 places, 6,626 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.