Burundi vs Guatemala: Net food imports by crop - Soybeans

Burundi
28
in 2019
Guatemala
23
in 2019
Burundi rank
80th
Guatemala rank
81st

Net food imports by crop - Soybeans over time

  • Burundi
  • Guatemala
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119902019

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 28 against 23 in Guatemala, a difference of 5.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Guatemala ahead.

Burundi ranks 80th and Guatemala ranks 81st of 165 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 572 560.5 11.5 Burundi
2010s 245.12 11,932 11,686 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - soybeans, Burundi or Guatemala?
Burundi, at 28 against 23 in Guatemala as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - soybeans between Burundi and Guatemala?
5, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Guatemala?
10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Burundi and Guatemala rank globally for net food imports by crop - soybeans?
Burundi ranks 80th and Guatemala ranks 81st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Soybeans. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Soybeans
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
165 places, 6,626 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.