Angola vs Iraq: Net food imports by crop - Soybeans

Angola
-49
in 2019
Iraq
-41
in 2019
Angola rank
109th
Iraq rank
107th

Net food imports by crop - Soybeans over time

  • Angola
  • Iraq
-300.0k-200.0k-100.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Iraq currently reports -41 against -49 in Angola, a difference of 8.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Angola ranks 109th and Iraq ranks 107th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 4 and Iraq in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Iraq Difference Ahead
1960s -119,674 -96,302 23,372 Iraq
1970s -53,048 4,698 57,746 Iraq
1980s -50 -30,830 30,780 Angola
1990s 2,460 40.5 2,420 Angola
2000s 151.5 -105,296 105,447 Angola
2010s 161.33 42.67 118.67 Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - soybeans, Angola or Iraq?
Iraq, at -41 against -49 in Angola as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - soybeans between Angola and Iraq?
8, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Iraq?
48 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Angola and Iraq rank globally for net food imports by crop - soybeans?
Angola ranks 109th and Iraq ranks 107th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Soybeans. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Soybeans
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
165 places, 6,626 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.