Latvia vs Netherlands: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy
Latvia
-116,546
in 2018
Netherlands
-91,697
in 2019
Latvia rank
144th
Netherlands rank
141st
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy over time
- Latvia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports -91,697 against -116,546 in Latvia, a difference of 24,849.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 144th and Netherlands ranks 141st of 168 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | -157,266 | 157,266 | Latvia |
| 1970s | 0 | -181,111 | 181,111 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 0 | -231,533 | 231,533 | Latvia |
| 1990s | -580.62 | -354,850 | 354,269 | Latvia |
| 2000s | -46,697 | -212,578 | 165,880 | Latvia |
| 2010s | -140,625 | -150,338 | 9,713 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, Latvia or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at -91,697 against -116,546 in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy between Latvia and Netherlands?
- 24,849, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy?
- Latvia ranks 144th and Netherlands ranks 141st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.