Laos vs Lithuania: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy

Laos
-180,134
in 2019
Lithuania
-186,558
in 2017
Laos rank
149th
Lithuania rank
150th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy over time

  • Laos
  • Lithuania
-300.0k-200.0k-100.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Laos currently reports -180,134 against -186,558 in Lithuania, a difference of 6,424.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Laos ahead.

Laos ranks 149th and Lithuania ranks 150th of 168 countries.

Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s -4,064 -14,831 10,767 Laos
2000s -60,389 -158,544 98,155 Laos
2010s -171,740 -185,038 13,298 Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, Laos or Lithuania?
Laos, at -180,134 against -186,558 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy between Laos and Lithuania?
6,424, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Lithuania?
21 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.
How do Laos and Lithuania rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy?
Laos ranks 149th and Lithuania ranks 150th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 6,315 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.