Kyrgyzstan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy
Kyrgyzstan
-345
in 2018
Sao Tome and Principe
-304
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan rank
103rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
101st
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -304 against -345 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 41.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 101st of 168 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 150 | 4 | 146 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 71.8 | -49.4 | 121.2 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, Kyrgyzstan or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at -304 against -345 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy between Kyrgyzstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 41, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 101st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.