Indonesia vs Vanuatu: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy

Indonesia
124
in 2019
Vanuatu
341
in 2013
Indonesia rank
36th
Vanuatu rank
33rd

Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy over time

  • Indonesia
  • Vanuatu
-200.0k-100.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 341 against 124 in Indonesia, a difference of 217.

That makes Vanuatu's figure about 2.8 times Indonesia's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 36th and Vanuatu ranks 33rd of 168 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 2,911 201.5 2,709 Indonesia
2010s 8,784 457.75 8,327 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, Indonesia or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 341 against 124 in Indonesia as of 2013.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy between Indonesia and Vanuatu?
217, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Vanuatu?
8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
How do Indonesia and Vanuatu rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy?
Indonesia ranks 36th and Vanuatu ranks 33rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 6,315 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.