Eswatini, Kingdom of vs Malaysia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy
Eswatini, Kingdom of
-212
in 2019
Malaysia
-115
in 2019
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
99th
Malaysia rank
97th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy over time
- Eswatini, Kingdom of
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports -115 against -212 in Eswatini, Kingdom of, a difference of 97.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 99th and Malaysia ranks 97th of 168 countries.
Eswatini, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini, Kingdom of | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,794 | 254.7 | 2,539 | Eswatini, Kingdom of |
| 2010s | 2,707 | -69.1 | 2,776 | Eswatini, Kingdom of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, Eswatini, Kingdom of or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at -115 against -212 in Eswatini, Kingdom of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy between Eswatini, Kingdom of and Malaysia?
- 97, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini, Kingdom of and Malaysia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini, Kingdom of and Malaysia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy?
- Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 99th and Malaysia ranks 97th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.