Bhutan vs Cyprus: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy

Bhutan
71
in 2019
Cyprus
80
in 2019
Bhutan rank
39th
Cyprus rank
37th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy over time

  • Bhutan
  • Cyprus
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 80 against 71 in Bhutan, a difference of 9.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cyprus ahead.

Bhutan ranks 39th and Cyprus ranks 37th of 168 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Cyprus in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Cyprus Difference Ahead
1990s -67 313.88 380.88 Cyprus
2000s 160.6 174.1 13.5 Cyprus
2010s 285.11 76.78 208.33 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, Bhutan or Cyprus?
Cyprus, at 80 against 71 in Bhutan as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy between Bhutan and Cyprus?
9, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Cyprus?
27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Cyprus rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy?
Bhutan ranks 39th and Cyprus ranks 37th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 6,315 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.