Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy
Belarus
-306
in 2017
Sao Tome and Principe
-304
in 2014
Belarus rank
102nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
101st
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy over time
- Belarus
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -304 against -306 in Belarus, a difference of 2.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 101st of 168 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -34 | 4 | 38 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | -157.5 | 14.25 | 171.75 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at -304 against -306 in Belarus as of 2014.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 2, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy?
- Belarus ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 101st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.