Saudi Arabia vs Uganda: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled
Saudi Arabia
11,765
in 2019
Uganda
10,999
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
18th
Uganda rank
19th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Uganda
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 11,765 against 10,999 in Uganda, a difference of 766.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 19th of 168 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49,497 | -84 | 49,581 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 17,262 | -50,252 | 67,513 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled, Saudi Arabia or Uganda?
- Saudi Arabia, at 11,765 against 10,999 in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled between Saudi Arabia and Uganda?
- 766, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Uganda?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Uganda rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 19th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy with 90 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.