Malaysia vs Tanzania: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled
Malaysia
-115
in 2019
Tanzania
-108
in 2019
Malaysia rank
97th
Tanzania rank
96th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled over time
- Malaysia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports -108 against -115 in Malaysia, a difference of 7.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Tanzania ahead.
Malaysia ranks 97th and Tanzania ranks 96th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -12 | 392 | 404 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 254.7 | -394.1 | 648.8 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | -69.1 | -21,726 | 21,656 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled, Malaysia or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at -108 against -115 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled between Malaysia and Tanzania?
- 7, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tanzania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Tanzania rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled?
- Malaysia ranks 97th and Tanzania ranks 96th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy with 90 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.