Brazil vs Nicaragua: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled
Brazil
91,430
in 2019
Nicaragua
115,367
in 2019
Brazil rank
9th
Nicaragua rank
7th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 115,367 against 91,430 in Brazil, a difference of 23,937.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 9th and Nicaragua ranks 7th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 367,580 | 17,790 | 349,791 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 164,092 | 119,890 | 44,201 | Brazil |
| 2010s | -5.05 million | 115,898 | 5.17 million | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled, Brazil or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 115,367 against 91,430 in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled between Brazil and Nicaragua?
- 23,937, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Nicaragua?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Nicaragua rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 9th and Nicaragua ranks 7th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy with 90 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.