Brazil vs El Salvador: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled
Brazil
91,430
in 2019
El Salvador
72,885
in 2019
Brazil rank
9th
El Salvador rank
10th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- El Salvador
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 91,430 against 72,885 in El Salvador, a difference of 18,545.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 9th and El Salvador ranks 10th of 168 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7 | -2,812 | 2,819 | Brazil |
| 1970s | 250.9 | -8,403 | 8,654 | Brazil |
| 1980s | 47,847 | -5,618 | 53,465 | Brazil |
| 1990s | 278,191 | 14,782 | 263,409 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 164,092 | 70,734 | 93,358 | Brazil |
| 2010s | -5.05 million | 68,150 | 5.12 million | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled, Brazil or El Salvador?
- Brazil, at 91,430 against 72,885 in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled between Brazil and El Salvador?
- 18,545, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and El Salvador?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and El Salvador rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 9th and El Salvador ranks 10th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy with 90 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.