Brazil vs Colombia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled
Brazil
91,430
in 2019
Colombia
128,753
in 2019
Brazil rank
9th
Colombia rank
6th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 128,753 against 91,430 in Brazil, a difference of 37,323.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.4 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 9th and Colombia ranks 6th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Colombia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 616,422 | 154,346 | 462,076 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 164,092 | 8,559 | 155,533 | Brazil |
| 2010s | -5.05 million | 45,788 | 5.10 million | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled, Brazil or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 128,753 against 91,430 in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled between Brazil and Colombia?
- 37,323, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Colombia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Colombia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 9th and Colombia ranks 6th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy with 90 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.