Belarus vs Central African Republic: Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled
Belarus
-306
in 2017
Central African Republic
-351
in 2015
Belarus rank
102nd
Central African Republic rank
104th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled over time
- Belarus
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -306 against -351 in Central African Republic, a difference of 45.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Belarus ranks 102nd and Central African Republic ranks 104th of 168 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,002 | 0 | 1,002 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | -288.8 | 0.3 | 289.1 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | -6,144 | 1,497 | 7,641 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled, Belarus or Central African Republic?
- Belarus, at -306 against -351 in Central African Republic as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled between Belarus and Central African Republic?
- 45, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central African Republic?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Belarus and Central African Republic rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, paddy, gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 102nd and Central African Republic ranks 104th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports by crop - Rice, paddy with 90 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.