Denmark vs Lithuania: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled
Denmark
-489,650
in 2019
Lithuania
-277,434
in 2019
Denmark rank
167th
Lithuania rank
164th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled over time
- Denmark
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports -277,434 against -489,650 in Denmark, a difference of 212,216.
Across all 58 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 167th and Lithuania ranks 164th of 178 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -176,749 | 0 | 176,749 | Lithuania |
| 1970s | -452,032 | 0 | 452,032 | Lithuania |
| 1980s | -879,306 | 0 | 879,306 | Lithuania |
| 1990s | -853,931 | -5,915 | 848,016 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | -610,842 | -147,732 | 463,110 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | -792,081 | -210,553 | 581,528 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, milled, Denmark or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at -277,434 against -489,650 in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, milled between Denmark and Lithuania?
- 212,216, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Lithuania?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Lithuania rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, milled?
- Denmark ranks 167th and Lithuania ranks 164th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.