Cyprus vs Seychelles: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled

Cyprus
8,040
in 2019
Seychelles
7,769
in 2018
Cyprus rank
107th
Seychelles rank
108th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled over time

  • Cyprus
  • Seychelles
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 8,040 against 7,769 in Seychelles, a difference of 271.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 107th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 178 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 6,000 5,907 93 Cyprus
2010s 6,231 6,194 37.25 Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, milled, Cyprus or Seychelles?
Cyprus, at 8,040 against 7,769 in Seychelles as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, milled between Cyprus and Seychelles?
271, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Seychelles?
11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Cyprus and Seychelles rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, milled?
Cyprus ranks 107th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 7,853 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.