Belarus vs Dominican Republic: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled
Belarus
24,050
in 2019
Dominican Republic
23,552
in 2019
Belarus rank
85th
Dominican Republic rank
86th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled over time
- Belarus
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 24,050 against 23,552 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 498.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Belarus ranks 85th and Dominican Republic ranks 86th of 179 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 383.2 | 53,580 | 53,197 | Dominican Republic |
| 2000s | 24,608 | 34,209 | 9,601 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 21,409 | 22,050 | 641.2 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, milled, Belarus or Dominican Republic?
- Belarus, at 24,050 against 23,552 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, milled between Belarus and Dominican Republic?
- 498, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Dominican Republic?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Dominican Republic rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, milled?
- Belarus ranks 85th and Dominican Republic ranks 86th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.