Angola vs Sri Lanka: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled
Angola
380,545
in 2019
Sri Lanka
369,997
in 2019
Angola rank
26th
Sri Lanka rank
27th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled over time
- Angola
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Angola currently reports 380,545 against 369,997 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 10,548.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Angola ranks 26th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 179 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -117,919 | 449,803 | 567,722 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | -36,152 | 357,156 | 393,307 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 55,041 | 80,053 | 25,011 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 60,257 | 109,786 | 49,529 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 195,900 | 76,316 | 119,585 | Angola |
| 2010s | 391,060 | 247,784 | 143,276 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, milled, Angola or Sri Lanka?
- Angola, at 380,545 against 369,997 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, milled between Angola and Sri Lanka?
- 10,548, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sri Lanka?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Sri Lanka rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, milled?
- Angola ranks 26th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.