Georgia vs Slovenia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, gaps filled
Georgia
4,964
in 2019
Slovenia
5,949
in 2019
Georgia rank
115th
Slovenia rank
112th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, gaps filled over time
- Georgia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 5,949 against 4,964 in Georgia, a difference of 985.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Slovenia ahead.
Georgia ranks 115th and Slovenia ranks 112th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,319 | 8,300 | 6,981 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 3,587 | 5,949 | 2,362 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 3,533 | 2,610 | 923.1 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, milled, gaps filled, Georgia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 5,949 against 4,964 in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, milled, gaps filled between Georgia and Slovenia?
- 985, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Slovenia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Slovenia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, milled, gaps filled?
- Georgia ranks 115th and Slovenia ranks 112th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.