Central African Republic vs Sweden: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, annual growth rate

Central African Republic
46.05 % change on previous year
in 2013
Sweden
43.03 % change on previous year
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
43rd
Sweden rank
45th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, annual growth rate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Sweden
-1.0k-5000500196219902019

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 46.05 % change on previous year against 43.03 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 3.02 % change on previous year.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 27 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sweden ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 43rd and Sweden ranks 45th of 175 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 19.54 % change on previous year -37.17 % change on previous year 56.71 % change on previous year Central African Republic
1970s 43.93 % change on previous year -75.65 % change on previous year 119.58 % change on previous year Central African Republic
1980s 78.81 % change on previous year 43.54 % change on previous year 35.28 % change on previous year Central African Republic
1990s -22.75 % change on previous year -205.49 % change on previous year 182.74 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2000s 27.14 % change on previous year -34.96 % change on previous year 62.1 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2010s 67.41 % change on previous year -40.14 % change on previous year 107.55 % change on previous year Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, milled, annual growth rate, Central African Republic or Sweden?
Central African Republic, at 46.05 % change on previous year against 43.03 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2013.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, milled, annual growth rate between Central African Republic and Sweden?
3.02 % change on previous year, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sweden?
50 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2013.
How do Central African Republic and Sweden rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, milled, annual growth rate?
Central African Republic ranks 43rd and Sweden ranks 45th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Sweden: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/net-food-imports-by-crop-rice-milled-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/net-food-imports-by-crop-rice-milled-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/sweden/">Central African Republic vs Sweden: Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,811 data points, 1962–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net food imports by crop - Rice, milled. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.