Mauritius vs Rwanda: Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked

Mauritius
-67
in 2019
Rwanda
-82
in 2019
Mauritius rank
98th
Rwanda rank
100th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked over time

  • Mauritius
  • Rwanda
-7.5k-5.0k-2.5k02.5k5.0k196119902019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -67 against -82 in Rwanda, a difference of 15.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mauritius ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s -3 2,118 2,121 Rwanda
2000s 367.2 490.8 123.6 Rwanda
2010s 68.9 -1,373 1,442 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, husked, Mauritius or Rwanda?
Mauritius, at -67 against -82 in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, husked between Mauritius and Rwanda?
15, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Rwanda?
27 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and Rwanda rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, husked?
Mauritius ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,950 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.