Mauritius vs Peru: Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked

Mauritius
-67
in 2019
Peru
-47
in 2013
Mauritius rank
98th
Peru rank
96th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked over time

  • Mauritius
  • Peru
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119902019

How they compare

Peru currently reports -47 against -67 in Mauritius, a difference of 20.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Mauritius ranks 98th and Peru ranks 96th of 167 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Peru Difference Ahead
1960s -5.67 0 5.67 Peru
1970s -0.2 0 0.2 Peru
1990s 97.5 56,308 56,210 Peru
2000s 367.2 3,584 3,216 Peru
2010s 49.75 -124 173.75 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, husked, Mauritius or Peru?
Peru, at -47 against -67 in Mauritius as of 2013.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, husked between Mauritius and Peru?
20, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Peru?
35 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Mauritius and Peru rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, husked?
Mauritius ranks 98th and Peru ranks 96th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,950 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.