Israel vs Malaysia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked
Israel
910
in 2019
Malaysia
1,268
in 2019
Israel rank
46th
Malaysia rank
45th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked over time
- Israel
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1,268 against 910 in Israel, a difference of 358.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.4 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.
Israel ranks 46th and Malaysia ranks 45th of 168 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19,823 | 13,835 | 5,988 | Israel |
| 1970s | 34,249 | 1,724 | 32,524 | Israel |
| 1980s | 18,078 | -12,342 | 30,420 | Israel |
| 1990s | 7,293 | -25 | 7,318 | Israel |
| 2000s | -491.8 | 58,344 | 58,836 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | -3,141 | 2,309 | 5,450 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, husked, Israel or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 1,268 against 910 in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, husked between Israel and Malaysia?
- 358, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Malaysia?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Malaysia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, husked?
- Israel ranks 46th and Malaysia ranks 45th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.