Ecuador vs Namibia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked

Ecuador
-46
in 2019
Namibia
-29
in 2019
Ecuador rank
95th
Namibia rank
92nd

Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
-2.0k02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199620072019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -29 against -46 in Ecuador, a difference of 17.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 92nd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,753 52 2,701 Ecuador
2000s -136.3 75.2 211.5 Namibia
2010s 141 92.2 48.8 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, husked, Ecuador or Namibia?
Namibia, at -29 against -46 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, husked between Ecuador and Namibia?
17, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
18 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, husked?
Ecuador ranks 95th and Namibia ranks 92nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,950 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.