Cambodia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked
Cambodia
552
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
543
in 2014
Cambodia rank
51st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
53rd
Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked over time
- Cambodia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 552 against 543 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 9.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Cambodia ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 53rd of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 4,171 | 4,171 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 3,227 | 2,448 | 779.4 | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, husked, Cambodia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Cambodia, at 552 against 543 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, husked between Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 9, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, husked?
- Cambodia ranks 51st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 53rd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, husked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.