Mexico vs Namibia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Mexico
7,841
in 2019
Namibia
8,131
in 2019
Mexico rank
43rd
Namibia rank
42nd

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Mexico
  • Namibia
-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k020.0k196119902019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 8,131 against 7,841 in Mexico, a difference of 290.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Namibia ahead.

Mexico ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,514 1,752 762.33 Mexico
2000s 2,047 4,730 2,683 Namibia
2010s 8,526 3,836 4,689 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Mexico or Namibia?
Namibia, at 8,131 against 7,841 in Mexico as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Mexico and Namibia?
290, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Namibia?
23 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2019.
How do Mexico and Namibia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Mexico ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.