Guinea vs Nepal: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Guinea
34,104
in 2019
Nepal
36,039
in 2019
Guinea rank
21st
Nepal rank
20th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Guinea
  • Nepal
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119902019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 36,039 against 34,104 in Guinea, a difference of 1,935.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 20th of 167 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 56,755 1,630 55,125 Guinea
2000s 78,454 8,422 70,033 Guinea
2010s 32,871 26,754 6,117 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Guinea or Nepal?
Nepal, at 36,039 against 34,104 in Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Guinea and Nepal?
1,935, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Nepal?
25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
How do Guinea and Nepal rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Guinea ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 20th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.