Finland vs United Arab Emirates: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Finland
-131,670
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
-94,810
in 2019
Finland rank
147th
United Arab Emirates rank
145th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time
- Finland
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports -94,810 against -131,670 in Finland, a difference of 36,860.
Across all 18 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 147th and United Arab Emirates ranks 145th of 168 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -118,548 | -2,184 | 116,363 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | -204,915 | -39,758 | 165,157 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Finland or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at -94,810 against -131,670 in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Finland and United Arab Emirates?
- 36,860, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and United Arab Emirates?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Finland and United Arab Emirates rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
- Finland ranks 147th and United Arab Emirates ranks 145th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.