Dominica vs Malta: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Dominica
463
in 2017
Malta
261
in 2019
Dominica rank
75th
Malta rank
78th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Dominica
  • Malta
-10.0k-5.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 463 against 261 in Malta, a difference of 202.

That makes Dominica's figure about 1.8 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malta ahead.

Dominica ranks 75th and Malta ranks 78th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 14.44 918.22 903.78 Malta
2010s 89 -158.14 247.14 Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Dominica or Malta?
Dominica, at 463 against 261 in Malta as of 2017.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Dominica and Malta?
202, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Malta?
16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
How do Dominica and Malta rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Dominica ranks 75th and Malta ranks 78th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.