Chile vs Liberia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Chile
27,597
in 2019
Liberia
25,135
in 2019
Chile rank
23rd
Liberia rank
24th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time
- Chile
- Liberia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 27,597 against 25,135 in Liberia, a difference of 2,462.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.
Chile ranks 23rd and Liberia ranks 24th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Liberia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1,894 | -4.89 | 1,889 | Liberia |
| 1970s | -3,004 | -76.3 | 2,928 | Liberia |
| 1980s | -3,413 | -164.6 | 3,249 | Liberia |
| 1990s | 10,520 | 0 | 10,520 | Chile |
| 2000s | 20,103 | 1,558 | 18,544 | Chile |
| 2010s | 24,628 | 17,475 | 7,153 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Chile or Liberia?
- Chile, at 27,597 against 25,135 in Liberia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Chile and Liberia?
- 2,462, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Liberia?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Liberia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
- Chile ranks 23rd and Liberia ranks 24th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.