Brazil vs Rwanda: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Brazil
5,569
in 2019
Rwanda
6,706
in 2019
Brazil rank
48th
Rwanda rank
46th
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time
- Brazil
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 6,706 against 5,569 in Brazil, a difference of 1,137.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 48th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | -583.89 | 583.89 | Brazil |
| 1970s | 883.4 | 0 | 883.4 | Brazil |
| 1980s | 4,958 | 28.9 | 4,930 | Brazil |
| 1990s | 24,384 | 278.8 | 24,105 | Brazil |
| 2000s | -7,409 | 1,205 | 8,614 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | -5.12 million | 34,119 | 5.15 million | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Brazil or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 6,706 against 5,569 in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Brazil and Rwanda?
- 1,137, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Rwanda?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Rwanda rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
- Brazil ranks 48th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.