Bolivia vs Uruguay: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Bolivia
-22,271
in 2016
Uruguay
-40,840
in 2014
Bolivia rank
130th
Uruguay rank
133rd

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Bolivia
  • Uruguay
-125.0k-100.0k-75.0k-50.0k-25.0k0199320042016

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports -22,271 against -40,840 in Uruguay, a difference of 18,569.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 130th and Uruguay ranks 133rd of 167 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 29 -25,381 25,410 Bolivia
2000s 703.3 -21,539 22,242 Bolivia
2010s 882.2 -29,660 30,542 Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Bolivia or Uruguay?
Bolivia, at -22,271 against -40,840 in Uruguay as of 2016.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Bolivia and Uruguay?
18,569, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Uruguay?
16 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2014.
How do Bolivia and Uruguay rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Bolivia ranks 130th and Uruguay ranks 133rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.