Bhutan vs Chile: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Bhutan
23,438
in 2019
Chile
27,597
in 2019
Bhutan rank
25th
Chile rank
23rd

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Bhutan
  • Chile
-10.0k010.0k20.0k30.0k196119902019

How they compare

Chile currently reports 27,597 against 23,438 in Bhutan, a difference of 4,159.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Chile ahead.

Bhutan ranks 25th and Chile ranks 23rd of 167 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Chile Difference Ahead
1990s -39.5 13,167 13,206 Chile
2010s 10,996 24,061 13,064 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Bhutan or Chile?
Chile, at 27,597 against 23,438 in Bhutan as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Bhutan and Chile?
4,159, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Chile?
14 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Chile rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Bhutan ranks 25th and Chile ranks 23rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.