Belize vs Tunisia: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Belize
-7,123
in 2019
Tunisia
-5,556
in 2015
Belize rank
124th
Tunisia rank
123rd

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Belize
  • Tunisia
-30.0k-20.0k-10.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports -5,556 against -7,123 in Belize, a difference of 1,567.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 124th and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 14.67 9.33 5.33 Belize
2000s -346.25 -165.62 180.62 Tunisia
2010s -6,322 -2,700 3,622 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Belize or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at -5,556 against -7,123 in Belize as of 2015.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Belize and Tunisia?
1,567, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Tunisia?
16 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2014.
How do Belize and Tunisia rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Belize ranks 124th and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.