Belize vs Luxembourg: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Belize
-7,123
in 2019
Luxembourg
-13,613
in 2019
Belize rank
124th
Luxembourg rank
125th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Belize
  • Luxembourg
-30.0k-20.0k-10.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Belize currently reports -7,123 against -13,613 in Luxembourg, a difference of 6,490.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 124th and Luxembourg ranks 125th of 167 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s -346.25 -16,582 16,236 Belize
2010s -5,702 -14,659 8,956 Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Belize or Luxembourg?
Belize, at -7,123 against -13,613 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Belize and Luxembourg?
6,490, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Luxembourg?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Belize and Luxembourg rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Belize ranks 124th and Luxembourg ranks 125th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.