Barbados vs Malta: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Barbados
226
in 2019
Malta
261
in 2019
Barbados rank
79th
Malta rank
78th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Barbados
  • Malta
-10.0k-5.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Malta currently reports 261 against 226 in Barbados, a difference of 35.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.

Barbados ranks 79th and Malta ranks 78th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 55.6 914.1 858.5 Malta
2010s 348.9 -42.4 391.3 Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Barbados or Malta?
Malta, at 261 against 226 in Barbados as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Barbados and Malta?
35, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Barbados ranks 79th and Malta ranks 78th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.