Australia vs Kazakhstan: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Australia
-2.86 million
in 2019
Kazakhstan
-1.64 million
in 2019
Australia rank
164th
Kazakhstan rank
161st
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time
- Australia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports -1.64 million against -2.86 million in Australia, a difference of 1.22 million.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 164th and Kazakhstan ranks 161st of 167 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.31 million | -757,269 | 2.55 million | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | -3.50 million | -415,214 | 3.08 million | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | -5.37 million | -789,043 | 4.58 million | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Australia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at -1.64 million against -2.86 million in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 1.22 million, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
- Australia ranks 164th and Kazakhstan ranks 161st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.