Armenia vs Belarus: Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken

Armenia
490
in 2019
Belarus
710
in 2019
Armenia rank
73rd
Belarus rank
70th

Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken over time

  • Armenia
  • Belarus
-30.0k-20.0k-10.0k0199820082019

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 710 against 490 in Armenia, a difference of 220.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.4 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.

Armenia ranks 73rd and Belarus ranks 70th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Belarus Difference Ahead
2000s 215.2 2,245 2,030 Belarus
2010s 441.9 -2,376 2,818 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - rice, broken, Armenia or Belarus?
Belarus, at 710 against 490 in Armenia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - rice, broken between Armenia and Belarus?
220, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for net food imports by crop - rice, broken?
Armenia ranks 73rd and Belarus ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Rice, broken
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
168 places, 5,714 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.