Senegal vs Thailand: Net food imports by crop - Maize
Senegal
357,557
in 2019
Thailand
400,672
in 2019
Senegal rank
47th
Thailand rank
46th
Net food imports by crop - Maize over time
- Senegal
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 400,672 against 357,557 in Senegal, a difference of 43,115.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 47th and Thailand ranks 46th of 177 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 4 and Thailand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,273 | 82.67 | 16,190 | Senegal |
| 1970s | 18,398 | 1,160 | 17,238 | Senegal |
| 1980s | 11,400 | 672.4 | 10,727 | Senegal |
| 1990s | 24,101 | 164,176 | 140,075 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 81,505 | 155,512 | 74,007 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 212,599 | 203,218 | 9,381 | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Senegal or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 400,672 against 357,557 in Senegal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Senegal and Thailand?
- 43,115, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Thailand?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
- How do Senegal and Thailand rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
- Senegal ranks 47th and Thailand ranks 46th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.