New Caledonia vs Uganda: Net food imports by crop - Maize

New Caledonia
782
in 2018
Uganda
789
in 2019
New Caledonia rank
136th
Uganda rank
135th

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Uganda
-300.0k-200.0k-100.0k0196119902019

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 789 against 782 in New Caledonia, a difference of 7.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Uganda ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 135th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 1,221 19,557 18,336 Uganda
2010s 2,607 -58,735 61,342 New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, New Caledonia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 789 against 782 in New Caledonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between New Caledonia and Uganda?
7, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Uganda?
13 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do New Caledonia and Uganda rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
New Caledonia ranks 136th and Uganda ranks 135th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.