Liberia vs Malawi: Net food imports by crop - Maize

Liberia
1,033
in 2019
Malawi
957
in 2019
Liberia rank
130th
Malawi rank
131st

Net food imports by crop - Maize over time

  • Liberia
  • Malawi
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119902019

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 1,033 against 957 in Malawi, a difference of 76.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Malawi ahead.

Liberia ranks 130th and Malawi ranks 131st of 177 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 50,000 173,766 123,766 Malawi
2000s 39,620 75,359 35,739 Malawi
2010s 2,249 58,994 56,745 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net food imports by crop - maize, Liberia or Malawi?
Liberia, at 1,033 against 957 in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in net food imports by crop - maize between Liberia and Malawi?
76, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Malawi?
21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
How do Liberia and Malawi rank globally for net food imports by crop - maize?
Liberia ranks 130th and Malawi ranks 131st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data, published as Net food imports by crop - Maize. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net food imports by crop - Maize
Source
FAOSTAT. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
178 places, 7,874 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Net food imports are generated from FAOSTAT, taking Export level (tonnes) from the Import level (tonnes) [both under Trade: Crops and Livestock Products]. Net food imports are a proxy for the country's vulnerability to global food prices.